The Protective Order Western District of Texas form is a crucial document designed to set specified guidelines for the handling of confidential and sensitive information during litigation. It outlines detailed provisions about what constitutes Classified Information, the individuals qualified to access such information, and the criteria for designating information as confidential. This ensures that sensitive data is protected throughout the legal proceedings. Click the button below to fill out the form and safeguard confidential information in compliance with court orders.
In the realm of legal proceedings, the confidentiality and protective order established by the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas plays a pivotal role in safeguarding sensitive information. Stemming from a joint motion by opposing parties within a case, this order meticulously outlines the treatment, designation, and permissible disclosure of information deemed confidential, ranging from documents to deposition testimonies. Classified Information, as designated under this order, encompasses a broad spectrum of data, including trade secrets, financial records, and personal information protected by law, which parties believe should remain confidential to prevent competitive disadvantage or legal liability. The order categorizes Qualified Persons who are allowed access to such information, stipulating stringent criteria to ensure that access is limited to individuals directly involved in the case, thereby minimizing unnecessary exposure. Provisions are made for the marking of documents to indicate their confidentiality level, the procedures for disclosure at depositions, and the handling of unintentional disclosures, emphasizing a rigorous approach to confidentiality. Moreover, the order restricts the usage of Classified Information solely to the preparation and conduct of the litigation at hand, barring its use for any unrelated purposes, ensuring that the integrity and privacy of the involved parties' sensitive data are maintained throughout the legal process.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
Plaintiff
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Defendant
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
Before the court is the joint motion of the parties for the entry of a confidentiality and
protective order (“Protective Order”). After careful consideration, it is hereby ORDERED as
follows:
1.Classified Information
“Classified Information” means any information of any type, kind, or character that is
designated as “Confidential”, “For Counsel Only”, or “Attorneys Eyes Only” by any of the
supplying or receiving persons, whether it be a document, information contained in a document,
information revealed during a deposition, information revealed in an interrogatory answer, or
otherwise.
2.Qualified Persons
“Qualified Persons” means:
a.For Counsel or Attorneys Only information:
i.retained counsel for the parties in this litigation and their respective staff;
ii.actual or potential independent experts or consultants (and their administrative or clerical staff) engaged in connection with this litigation (which shall not include the current employees, officers, members, or agents of parties or affiliates of parties) who, prior to any disclosure of Classified Information to such person, have signed a document agreeing to
be bound by the terms of this Protective Order (such signed document to be maintained by the [attorney] retaining such person) and have been
designated in writing by notice to all counsel;
iii.this court and its staff and any other tribunal or dispute resolution officer duly appointed or assigned in connection with this litigation.
b. For Confidential information:
i.the persons identified in subparagraph 2(a);
ii.the party, if a natural person;
iii.if the party is an entity, such officers or employees of the party who are actively involved in the prosecution or defense of this case who, prior to any disclosure of Confidential information to such person, have been designated in writing by notice to all counsel and have signed a document agreeing to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order (such signed document to be maintained by the attorney designating such person);
iv.litigation vendors, court reporters, and other litigation support personnel;
v.any person who was an author, addressee, or intended or authorized recipient of the Confidential information and who agrees to keep the information confidential, provided that such persons may see and use the Confidential information but not retain a copy.
c.Such other person as this court may designate after notice and an opportunity to
be heard.
3.Designation Criteria
a.Nonclassified Information. Classified Information shall not include information
that either:
i.is in the public domain at the time of disclosure, as evidenced by a written document;
ii.becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the recipient, as evidenced by a written document;
iii.the receiving party can show by written document was in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of disclosure; or
iv.lawfully comes into the recipient’s possession subsequent to the time of disclosure from another source without restriction as to disclosure, provided such third party has the right to make the disclosure to the receiving party.
b.Classified Information. A party shall designate as Classified Information only
[ ]
such information that the party in good faith believes in fact is confidential. Information that is generally available to the public, such as public filings, catalogues, advertising materials, and the like, shall not be designated as Classified.
Information and documents that may be designated as Classified Information include, but are not limited to, trade secrets, confidential or proprietary financial information, operational data, business plans, and competitive analyses, personnel files, personal information that is protected by law, and other sensitive information that, if not restricted as set forth in this order, may subject the producing or disclosing person to competitive or financial injury or potential legal liability to third parties.
Correspondence and other communications between the parties or with nonparties may be designated as Classified Information if the communication was made with the understanding or reasonable expectation that the information would not become generally available to the public.
c.For Counsel or Attorneys Only. The designation “For Counsel Only” or “Attorneys Eyes Only” shall be reserved for information that is believed to be unknown to the opposing party or parties, or any of the employees of a corporate party. For purposes of this order, so-designated information includes, but is not limited to, product formula information, design information, non-public financial information, pricing information, customer identification data, and certain study methodologies.
d.Ultrasensitive Information. At this point, the parties do not anticipate the need for higher levels of confidentiality as to ultrasensitive documents or information. However, in the event that a court orders that ultrasensitive documents or information be produced, the parties will negotiate and ask the court to enter an ultrasensitive information protocol in advance of production to further protect such information.
4.
Use of Classified Information
All
Classified Information provided by
any party or nonparty in the course of this
[
]
litigation shall be used solely for the purpose of preparation, trial, and appeal of this litigation and for no other purpose, and shall not be disclosed except in accordance with the terms hereof.
5.Marking of Documents
Documents provided in this litigation may be designated by the producing person or by any party as Classified Information by marking each page of the documents so designated with a stamp indicating that the information is “Confidential”, “For Counsel Only”, or “Attorneys Eyes Only”. In lieu of marking the original of a document, if the original is not provided, the designating party may mark the copies that are provided. Originals shall be preserved for inspection.
6.Disclosure at Depositions
Information disclosed at (a) the deposition of a party or one of its present or former officers, directors, employees, agents, consultants, representatives, or independent experts retained by counsel for the purpose of this litigation, or (b) the deposition of a nonparty may be designated by any party as Classified Information by indicating on the record at the deposition that the testimony is “Confidential” or “For Counsel Only” and is subject to the provisions of this Order.
Any party also may designate information disclosed at a deposition as Classified Information by notifying all parties in writing not later than 30 days of receipt of the transcript of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that should be treated as Classified Information thereafter. Each party shall attach a copy of each such written notice to the face of the transcript and each copy thereof in that party’s possession, custody, or control. All deposition transcripts shall be treated as For Counsel Only for a period of 30 days after initial receipt of the transcript.
To the extent possible, the court reporter shall segregate into separate transcripts information designated as Classified Information with blank, consecutively numbered pages being provided in a nondesignated main transcript. The separate transcript containing Classified Information shall have page numbers that correspond to the blank pages in the main transcript.
Counsel for a party or a nonparty witness[ shall] have the right to exclude from depositions
any person who is not authorized to receive Classified Information pursuant to this Protective Order, but such right of exclusion shall be applicable only during periods of examination or testimony during which Classified Information is being used or discussed.
7.Disclosure to Qualified Persons
a.To Whom. Classified Information shall not be disclosed or made available by the receiving party to persons other than Qualified Persons except as necessary to comply with applicable law or the valid order of a court of competent jurisdiction; provided, however, that in the event of a disclosure compelled by law or court order, the receiving party will so notify the producing party as promptly as practicable (if at all possible, prior to making such disclosure) and shall seek a protective order or confidential treatment of such information. Information designated as For Counsel Only shall be restricted in circulation to Qualified Persons described in subparagraph 2(a).
b.Retention of Copies During this Litigation. Copies of For Counsel Only information shall be maintained only in the offices of outside counsel for the receiving party and, to the extent supplied to experts described in subparagraph 2(a)(ii), in the offices of those experts. Any documents produced in this litigation, regardless of classification, that are provided to Qualified Persons shall be maintained only at the office of such Qualified Person and only necessary working copies of any such documents shall be made. Copies of documents and exhibits containing Classified Information may be prepared by independent copy services, printers, or illustrators for the purpose of this litigation.
c.Each party’s outside counsel shall maintain a log of all copies of For Counsel Only documents that are delivered to Qualified Persons.
8.Unintentional Disclosures
Documents unintentionally produced without designation as Classified Information later may be designated and shall be treated as Classified Information from the date written notice of the designation is provided to the receiving party.
If a receiving party learns of any unauthorized disclosure of Confidential information or
For Counsel Only information, the party shall immediately upon learning of such disclosure inform the producing party of all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure and shall make all reasonable efforts to prevent disclosure by each unauthorized person who received such information.
9.Documents Produced for Inspection Prior to Designation
In the event documents are produced for inspection prior to designation, the documents shall be treated as For Counsel Only during inspection. At the time of copying for the receiving parties, Classified Information shall be marked prominently “Confidential”, “For Counsel Only”, or “Attorneys Eyes Only” by the producing party.
10.Consent to Disclosure and Use in Examination
Nothing in this order shall prevent disclosure beyond the terms of this order if each party designating the information as Classified Information consents to such disclosure or if the court, after notice to all affected parties and nonparties, orders such disclosure. Nor shall anything in this order prevent any counsel of record from utilizing Classified Information in the examination or cross-examination of any person who is indicated on the document as being an author, source, or recipient of the Classified Information, irrespective of which party produced such information.
11.Challenging the Designation
a.Classified Information. A party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of a designation of Classified Information at the time such designation is made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge to the designation. In the event that any party to this litigation disagrees at any stage of these proceedings with the designation of any information
as Classified Information, the parties shall first try to resolve the dispute in good faith on an informal basis, such as by production of redacted copies. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the objecting party may invoke this Protective Order by objecting in writing to the party who designated the document or information as Classified Information. The designating party shall then have 14 days to move the court for an order preserving the designated status of the disputed
information. The disputed information shall remain Classified Information unless and until the
court orders otherwise. Failure to move for an order shall constitute a termination of the status of such item as Classified Information.
b.Qualified Persons. In the event that any party in good faith disagrees with the designation of a person as a Qualified Person or the disclosure of particular Classified Information to such person, the parties shall first try to resolve the dispute in good faith on an informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the objecting party shall have 14 days from the date of the designation or, in the event particular Classified Information is requested subsequent to the designation of the Qualified Person, 14 days from service of the request to move the court for an order denying the disposed person (a) status as a Qualified Person, or (b) access to particular Classified Information. The objecting person shall have the burden of demonstrating that disclosure to the disputed person would expose the objecting party to the risk of serious harm. Upon the timely filing of such a motion, no disclosure of Classified Information shall be made to the disputed person unless and until the court enters an order preserving the designation.
12.Manner of Use in Proceedings
In the event a party wishes to use any Classified Information in affidavits, declarations, briefs, memoranda of law, or other papers filed in this litigation, the party shall do one of the following: (1) with the consent of the producing party, file only a redacted copy of the information; (2) where appropriate (e.g., in connection with discovery and evidentiary motions) provide the information solely for in camera review; or (3) file such information under seal with the court consistent with the sealing requirements of the court.
13.Filing Under Seal
The clerk of this court is directed to maintain under seal all documents, transcripts of deposition testimony, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and other papers filed under seal in this litigation that have been designated, in whole or in part, as Classified Information by any party to this litigation consistent with the sealing requirements of the court.
14.Return of Documents
Not later than 120 days after conclusion of this litigation and any appeal related to it, any
Classified Information, all reproductions of such information, and any notes, summaries, or descriptions of such information in the possession of any of the persons specified in paragraph 2 (except subparagraph 2(a)(iii)) shall be returned to the producing party or destroyed, except as this court may otherwise order or to the extent such information has been used as evidence at any trial or hearing. Notwithstanding this obligation to return or destroy information, counsel may retain attorney work product, including document indices, so long as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of any Classified Information.
15.Ongoing Obligations
Insofar as the provisions of this Protective Order, or any other protective orders entered in this litigation, restrict the communication and use of the information protected by it, such provisions shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of this litigation, except that (a) there shall be no restriction on documents that are used as exhibits in open court unless such exhibits were filed under seal, and (b) a party may seek the written permission of the producing party or order of the court with respect to dissolution or modification of this, or any other, protective order.
16.Advice to Clients
This order shall not bar any attorney in the course of rendering advice to such attorney’s client with respect to this litigation from conveying to any party client the attorney’s evaluation in a general way of Classified Information produced or exchanged under the terms of this order; provided, however, that in rendering such advice and otherwise communicating with the client, the attorney shall not disclose the specific contents of any Classified Information produced by another party if such disclosure would be contrary to the terms of this Protective Order.
17.Duty to Ensure Compliance
Any party designating any person as a Qualified Person shall have the duty to reasonably ensure that such person observes the terms of this Protective Order and shall be responsible upon breach of such duty for the failure of such person to observe the terms of this Protective Order.
18.Waiver
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502, neither the attorney-client privilege nor work product protection is waived by disclosure connected with this litigation.
19.Modification and Exceptions
The parties may, by stipulation, provide for exceptions to this order and any party may
seek an order of this court modifying this Protective Order.
It is SO ORDERED this
day of
, 20
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Filling out the Protective Order for the Western District of Texas requires careful attention to detail to ensure compliance with its conditions. This process involves clearly identifying relevant parties, classified information, and agreeing to the terms set out within the order. The Protective Order is designed to safeguard confidential information disclosed during litigation, outlining who can access this information, under what circumstances it can be disclosed, and the responsibilities of all involved in maintaining confidentiality. Here are the steps to properly complete the form:
Once the form is correctly filled out and all parties have acknowledged their responsibilities under the Protective Order, it should be submitted to the court for approval. This official step is crucial for the Protective Order to take effect, governing the handling of classified information throughout the litigation process. It's essential to abide by the terms of the Protective Order to maintain the integrity of the confidential information and to comply with the court's directives.
A Protective Order in the Western District of Texas is a court order issued to manage the use and disclosure of confidential or sensitive information during litigation. It is designed to protect trade secrets, proprietary financial information, personal information protected by law, and other sensitive data from being disclosed publicly or to unauthorized persons.
Classified Information includes any data, regardless of its nature, that is designated as “Confidential”, “For Counsel Only”, or “Attorneys Eyes Only” by any supplying or receiving party. This encompasses documents, deposition information, interrogatory answers, and more. Information that is public, rightfully possessed before disclosure, or lawfully obtained from another source without restrictions, is not classified.
Information should only be designated as Classified if it is confidential and not publicly available. This includes, but is not limited to, trade secrets, financial data, business plans, and personal info protected by law. Communication that was expected to remain private can also be classified. The designation should be made in good faith based on the belief that the information is confidential.
Classified Information disclosed in the course of litigation must be used solely for preparation, trial, and appeal. It must not be used for any other purpose and should be disclosed only in accordance with the terms of the Protective Order.
Documents should be marked on each page with the appropriate designation - “Confidential”, “For Counsel Only”, or “Attorneys Eyes Only”. If originals are not provided, copies must be marked, and originals preserved for inspection.
Classified Information can be designated during the deposition by indicating its classification on the record. After receiving the transcript, parties have 30 days to write and notify about the specific classified segments. All deposition transcripts are initially treated as For Counsel Only for 30 days, with specific provisions for segregating classified information into separate transcripts.
Classified Information can only be disclosed to Qualified Persons as necessary, with further restrictions applying to For Counsel Only information. Disclosure due to legal or court mandates must be promptly communicated to the producing party, and protective measures sought.
For Counsel Only information must be kept in the offices of the receiving party’s outside counsel or designated experts. A log of all distributed copies of For Counsel Only documents must be maintained by the party’s outside counsel.
Unintentionally disclosed documents without classification can later be designated as Classified, and from the moment written notice is given to the receiving party, the documents must be treated accordingly. If unauthorized disclosure occurs, measures need to be taken to rectify the situation.
Filling out the Protective Order for the Western District of Texas form requires careful attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the terms and requirements set forth within the document. Here are seven common mistakes individuals often make when completing this form:
In order to navigate the complexities of the Protective Order efficiently and effectively, attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the order's stipulations are paramount. Avoiding these mistakes not only ensures compliance but also protects the confidentiality and integrity of the sensitive information throughout the duration of the litigation process.
When parties in the Western District of Texas are working with a Protective Order, several forms and documents often accompany or support the order's implementation and compliance. The procedural nature of legal disputes necessitates a variety of documents to ensure confidentiality and the proper handling of sensitive information.
These documents play crucial roles in ensuring that sensitive information is handled according to the Protective Order's stipulations, thereby upholding the integrity of the legal process. Each document contributes to the overarching goal of protecting confidentiality while allowing for the necessary exchange of information during litigation.
The Protective Order from the Western District of Texas shares similarities with Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), as both instruments are designed to protect confidential information from being disclosed to unauthorized parties. NDAs are commonly used in business and employment settings to safeguard proprietary information, trade secrets, and other types of confidential data. Like the Protective Order, NDAs specify the types of information considered confidential, outline who is authorized to receive the information, and restrict the use of the information to certain purposes. Both documents also typically include provisions regarding the duration of the confidentiality obligations and the handling of inadvertent disclosures.
Similarly, Trade Secret Protection Orders also bear resemblance to the Protective Order, focusing specifically on the preservation of trade secrets during litigation. These orders protect against the disclosure of information that gives a business a competitive advantage, such as formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, or patterns. Like the Protective Order, Trade Secret Protection Orders identify what constitutes protected information, list authorized recipients, restrict usage to litigation-related purposes, and often include measures for dealing with accidental disclosures. The careful limitation of access to sensitive information reflects a shared goal of minimizing the risk of competitive harm.
Another comparable document is the Confidentiality Agreement used in mediation, which prevents parties from disclosing information exchanged during the mediation process. These agreements promote open communication between parties by ensuring that sensitive information disclosed during mediation cannot be used outside of the mediation context. While the Protective Order is applied within the broader context of litigation, both types of agreements delineate who may access confidential information, emphasize the confidential nature of disclosed information, and aim to prevent the unauthorized use of such information.
Employment Confidentiality Agreements present yet another parallel, especially concerning the handling of sensitive company information by employees. These agreements, often executed at the start of employment, cover the non-disclosure of proprietary information, defining both the scope of confidential information and the responsibilities of the employee to protect it. Similar to the Protective Order, Employment Confidentiality Agreements seek to restrict the dissemination of confidential information to unauthorized individuals and limit use to specified purposes, thereby protecting the employer's competitive interests and reducing the risk of information leaks.
When dealing with the Protective Order in the Western District of Texas form, it’s critical to understand and follow guidelines meticulously to ensure compliance and protect sensitive information appropriately. Below are some do’s and don’ts that should be kept in mind:
By adhering to these guidelines and conducting oneself with diligence and integrity, one can contribute to the smooth operation of the legal process and uphold the confidentiality requirements as set out by the court. This not only facilitates trust and cooperation among the involved parties but also helps in protecting the rights and sensitivities of all stakeholders within the litigation process.
When diving into the specifics of a Protective Order, particularly within the Western District of Texas, common misconceptions can lead to confusion and improper handling of confidential information. Understanding these misconceptions is crucial for parties involved in legal proceedings to ensure compliance and protect sensitive information properly.
Misconception 1: All information shared during litigation can be designated "Classified". This is incorrect. Only information that genuinely requires protection due to its sensitive nature and that meets the specific criteria outlined in the order should be designated as such. Publicly available information or data already in the lawful possession of the recipient cannot be considered "Classified".
Misconception 2: Once information is deemed "Confidential", it cannot enter the public domain. This is not necessarily true. Confidential information can become public if it enters the public domain through no fault of the receiving party, undermining its "Confidential" status.
Misconception 3: Any party can designate information as "For Counsel Only". In reality, the designation of information as "For Counsel Only" or "Attorneys Eyes Only" is reserved for data that is not known to the opposing party and is sensitive to the extent that its disclosure is tightly restricted even within the litigation process. It reflects a higher level of confidentiality, not a general classification for all sensitive information.
Misconception 4: Disclosures at depositions are automatically public. Contrary to this belief, the protective order allows for certain deposition disclosures to be designated as "Confidential" or "For Counsel Only" on the record, controlling the dissemination of sensitive information shared in these settings.
Misconception 5: "Classified Information" can be shared with any party involved in the litigation. The order clearly defines "Qualified Persons" who can access such information. It includes individuals like retained counsel and their staff, and certain designated experts, but not all parties involved in the case are granted automatic access.
Misconception 6: The protective order only applies to the duration of the trial. This is a misunderstanding. The protective order governs the handling of classified information beyond the conclusion of the trial, specifically stating that the use of such information is for the litigation and its appeal only. This limitation reinforces the perpetual nature of confidentiality obligations.
Misconception 7: Unintentional disclosure voids the classification of the information. The order makes provisions for unintentional disclosures, allowing the designating party to secure the classified status of the information even after an accidental disclosure, provided certain steps are taken to rectify the error. This ensures that the protective measures are not entirely forfeited due to mishaps in handling.
Understanding these nuances is paramount for any party involved in litigation within the Western District of Texas. Misconceptions can easily lead to non-compliance with a Protective Order, thus emphasizing the importance of comprehending its terms thoroughly. Correcting these common misunderstandings fosters a more respectful and secure handling of sensitive information throughout the legal process.
When filling out and using the Protective Order Western District of Texas form, several key points need to be considered for proper compliance and to ensure the confidentiality of sensitive information. The following key takeaways can serve as a guide:
Understanding and adhering to these guidelines ensures the protection of sensitive information throughout the litigation process, safeguarding the interests of all parties involved.
How Much Does a Writ of Mandamus Cost - The document articulates the legal and procedural grounds on which Taylor seeks to overturn her candidacy’s rejection.
Texas 74 221 - Designed to streamline the tax refund process for both taxpayers and the Texas Comptroller's office.
Natural Gas Tax - Producers must heed the stringent timelines outlined on the AP-180 form to avoid penalties and ensure tax savings.